Dr. Frank Sheridan, a forensic psychologist and the expert witness called on by the prosecution in the court-martial trial of Navy SEAL Eddie Gallagher, told the court on Monday that there is no evidence at all to prove a stabbing occurred in the death of an ISIS prisoner in 2017.
Fox News reported: “Investigators allege that, while the teen was receiving medical treatment from SEAL medics, Gallagher walked up and stabbed him in his neck and side with a knife, killing him. Then, they say, he posed for photographs with the fighter’s body, holding his head in one hand and his blade in the other.”
The complete lack of evidence that a stabbing even occurred is the newest development in the trial of Gallagher and comes the week after a SEAL Team Seven medic while testifying under an immunity agreement, admitted to the court that he killed the ISIS prisoner through asphyxiation. This medic had previously claimed he had seen Gallagher stab the prisoner, but immunity seems to have brought out the truth.
It is apparent that Lady Liberty does not like fake news and lying prosecutors messing with Navy SEALs. What started out as a complete attempt to destroy Eddie and his family using false testimony and fake evidence has backfired on the corrupt prosecution and their NCIS henchmen.
A spokesman for Iran’s Foreign Ministry claimed in a tweet Tuesday that the latest US sanctions on Iran permanently end the possibility of diplomacy between the two countries. Following this comment was Iranian President Rouhani who, in a live televised address on Tuesday, stated that the White House is “afflicted by mental retardation.”
The US sanctions have been increasingly strict in the past few weeks due to three separate Iranian attacks on the United States in the Strait of Hormuz, the last being the downing of a $100 million US Navy Drone.
Even though Iran, unprovoked, has been regularly attacking US ships in the Strait of Hormuz, the claim that the Trump administration “is destroying the established international mechanisms for maintaining world peace and security.” They make these claims as Trump continues to push for negotiations, even calling off a planned attack because the number of casualties would make it a “disproportionate” response to Iran’s attacks.
Despite the repeated attempts by the United States to conduct negotiations between the two countries, Iran insists on escalating tensions. I am not sure if Iran recognizes the bear they are poking. They have literally handed President Trump the keys to war that he can start whenever he wants. Iran is a child throwing pebbles at a giant, and the giant will only be merciful for so long.
The latest rape accusation against President Trump seems even more baseless than usual. The newest accuser is advice columnist E. Jean Carroll, who claims she was raped in the dressing room of a department store in the mid-90s when Trump would have been in their 50s.
Carroll released this alarming news for the first time in her new book, which comes out next week. Individuals like E. Jean Carroll should themselves be investigated when they bring baseless accusations of sexual misconduct 20 or more years from when they said it happen, especially when their old complaint is attached to a new book deal they are pushing like Ms. Carroll is now. So, let’s investigate:
Carroll’s story itself is very unbelievable. Carroll says that she and Trump ran into each other at a high-end department store, Trump somehow recognized the random advice columnist, and the two started flirting. Apparently, Trump then told her to try on some lingerie, and she, trying to “spin a comedy scene,” told Trump to try it on instead. Carroll, clearly being devoted to her art of comedy, then proceeded to go to the dressing room with Trump, somehow expecting him to try on the lingerie.
Allegedly, once in the dressing room, Trump proceeded to sexually assault Carroll, who “fought back” and was able to escape. To reiterate, Trump allegedly raped her during the store’s operating hours in a dressing room, which Carroll went into with a man she did not know for “comedy.”
Carroll also does not want a police investigation. This is very odd because the alleged assault would have happened in a public place, where there would have been many employees as witnesses. Carroll also still has the same dress she wore that night, and she has not worn it since. This would be crucial evidence, DNA stays on clothes for a very, very long time. The most bizarre reasoning for Carroll not wanting a police investigation was that she claimed it would be disrespectful to migrant women: “I would find it disrespectful to the women who are down on the border who are being raped around the clock down there without any protection. The women have very little protection there. It would just be disrespectful.”
There is literally no connection there whatsoever, and those same women also do not have the power to publicize their experiences and go on a book tour talking about them. If anything, it is disrespectful to them to not speak up when you have the power to prosecute. (There is no statute of limitations for rape accusations in the state of New York)
Carroll may or may not be lying, but these accusations should certainly be investigated. Carroll should not make public accusations if she does not want an investigation, the accusations damage the person who is accused, so if they are false then that should be known.
YouTube has deleted the Project Veritas video revealing a senior Google executive discussing what appears to be the tech giant’s plan to influence the 2020 elections.
— James O'Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) June 25, 2019
The video shows Jen Gennai, Google’s head of “Responsible Innovation” caught on camera saying the company has been working diligently to “prevent” a repeat of the 2016 election in 2020.
Gennai has responded to the video, writing in a post for Medium, “I was having a casual chat with someone at a restaurant and used some imprecise language. Project Veritas got me. Well done.”
In the Project Veritas video, Gennai was caught on camera saying, “We all got screwed over in 2016, again it wasn’t just us, it was, the people got screwed over, the news media got screwed over, like, everybody got screwed over so we’re rapidly been like, what happened there and how do we prevent it from happening again.”
“We’re also training our algorithms, like, if 2016 happened again, would we have, would the outcome be different?” she says in the footage.
Gennai also warned against Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s (D-MA) plan to break up the tech company because “all these smaller companies who don’t have the same resources that we do will be charged with preventing the next Trump situation, it’s like a small company cannot do that.”
Through this action of removing the video and suppressing it, Google has validated everything Project Veritas reported about their manipulative ways. This is a perfect example of how socialism (aka communism) works. The power is centralized and controlled by one group.
If you do not believe in their values, you will be shut out. Now imagine if Google was the government and they owned and controlled currency and the ability to buy and sell. Right now they have a monopoly on information, which is why Google needs to be broken up quickly and completely before the 2020 election.
You can still watch the whole video below:
The co-founders of Home Depot believe if Bernie Sanders were president when they tried to open their business in 1978, the home-improvement retailer may never have existed.
In an exclusive interview with Neil Cavuto, Bernie Marcus and Ken Langone explain why.
“Home Depot is the poster child for capitalism,” Marcus said.
When asked about Bernie Sanders’ plan to have Wall Street pay for $1.6 trillion in student-loan debt, the two had a few things to say about the self-proclaimed socialist’s plan:
“[Bernie Sanders] is the enemy of every entrepreneur that’s ever going to be born in the country and has been born in the past,” said Marcus.
I think it is safe to say that the cofounders of Home Depot, billionaires Bernie Marcus and Ken Langon know more about what is economically good for this country than Bernie Sanders. Both men are entrepreneurs that come from humble backgrounds, validating the free spirit of the capitalist system. As opposed to Bernie Sanders who lived in his parent’s basement until he was a middle-aged man and has never held a real job outside of a government office.
It always amazes me how narcissists like Bernie Sanders are able to get themselves elected over and over without even an ounce of professional knowledge in any leadership roles. He is like a serial killer that carefully picks his target and cultivates them over a period of time until the attack, except Bernie Sanders target, is the Constitution and the free market enterprise.